December 22, 2010, at 09:43 PM
by 24.201.40.207 -
Changed lines 42-43 from:
to:
December 19, 2009, at 05:05 PM
by 132.208.12.66 -
Added line 40:
December 07, 2009, at 09:25 PM
by 132.208.12.66 -
Added line 56:
December 07, 2009, at 09:24 PM
by 132.208.12.66 -
Changed lines 4-7 from:
Is just some pages to have a memo, not a real guide for buying photographic stuff. So don't be disappointed.
+++ UNDER CONSTRUCTION ++
to:
Just some memento pages, etc.
Changed lines 9-11 from:
Ce ne sont juste que quelque pages de mémo, pas vraiment un guide d'achat.
+++ En CONSTRUCTION +++
to:
Quelque pages de mémo, etc.
December 06, 2009, at 01:39 AM
by 132.208.65.140 -
Changed line 42 from:
to:
December 06, 2009, at 01:39 AM
by 132.208.65.140 -
Deleted line 66:
December 06, 2009, at 01:15 AM
by 132.208.65.140 -
Changed line 19 from:
to:
Changed line 23 from:
to:
December 04, 2009, at 09:14 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Added line 18:
Added line 22:
December 04, 2009, at 09:14 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Changed line 18 from:
to:
Changed line 21 from:
to:
December 04, 2009, at 09:12 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Changed line 68 from:
to:
December 04, 2009, at 08:55 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Changed lines 61-62 from:
to:
December 04, 2009, at 08:55 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Added lines 59-62:
December 01, 2009, at 10:36 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Added line 56:
December 01, 2009, at 10:36 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Changed lines 52-54 from:
to:
Changed lines 58-62 from:
to:
December 01, 2009, at 10:30 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Changed lines 42-43 from:
to:
December 01, 2009, at 10:29 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Deleted line 54:
Deleted line 55:
Changed lines 57-60 from:
to:
Deleted lines 59-60:
December 01, 2009, at 10:25 PM
by 24.37.141.19 -
Changed lines 39-40 from:
to:
October 03, 2009, at 05:13 PM
by 132.208.12.66 -
Changed line 42 from:
to:
October 03, 2009, at 05:12 PM
by 132.208.12.66 -
Added line 42:
February 08, 2009, at 05:40 AM
by 67.68.241.166 -
Added line 82:
December 01, 2008, at 04:35 AM
by 67.68.240.129 -
Changed line 71 from:
to:
Changed line 73 from:
to:
December 01, 2008, at 04:34 AM
by 67.68.240.129 -
Added lines 70-77:
(:if userlang en:)
(:if userlang fr:)
(:if:)
November 26, 2008, at 07:29 PM
by Lionel -
Deleted lines 18-19:
Deleted lines 21-22:
Deleted lines 26-31:
Deleted lines 29-34:
November 22, 2008, at 02:57 PM
by 67.68.204.102 -
Deleted line 72:
November 09, 2008, at 05:20 AM
by 67.68.240.198 -
Added lines 88-89:
Changed lines 92-96 from:
to:
November 08, 2008, at 06:25 PM
by 132.208.65.79 -
Changed lines 90-94 from:
- Bausch & Lomb Wide Angle Lens 88mm f/6.8 in Graphex
to:
November 08, 2008, at 06:07 PM
by 132.208.65.79 -
Added lines 55-56:
Added lines 60-62:
Changed lines 89-90 from:
- Schneider-Kreuznach 150mm f/4.5 Xenar in Compur (production date 1942)
- Graflex f/4.5 Optar in Graphex
to:
- Graflex 6" f/4.5 Optar in Graphex
November 07, 2008, at 02:41 PM
by 65.95.35.40 -
Changed lines 83-84 from:
to:
November 07, 2008, at 02:38 PM
by 65.95.35.40 -
Deleted line 65:
Changed line 83 from:
- Schneider-Kreutznach 150mm f/5.6 Symmar-S Multi Coated in Copal #0 (production date 1977)
to:
November 07, 2008, at 02:29 PM
by 65.95.35.40 -
Added line 67:
November 06, 2008, at 03:56 AM
by 65.95.33.145 -
Changed lines 72-74 from:
to:
November 06, 2008, at 03:55 AM
by 65.95.33.145 -
Added line 70:
Changed lines 72-74 from:
to:
September 18, 2008, at 06:25 AM
by 67.68.240.107 -
Changed lines 83-87 from:
- Bausch & Lomb Wide Angle Lens 90mm f/6.8 in Graphex
to:
- Bausch & Lomb Wide Angle Lens 88mm f/6.8 in Graphex
September 18, 2008, at 06:24 AM
by 67.68.240.107 -
Changed lines 80-85 from:
- Schneider-Kreutznach 150mm f/5.6 Symmar-S Multi Coated in Copal #0
to:
- Schneider-Kreutznach 150mm f/5.6 Symmar-S Multi Coated in Copal #0 (production date 1977)
- Schneider-Kreutznach 150mm f/4.5 Xenar in Compur (production date 1942)
- Graflex f/4.5 Optar in Graphex
- Bausch & Lomb Wide Angle Lens 90mm f/6.8 in Graphex
September 18, 2008, at 05:54 AM
by 67.68.240.107 -
Changed lines 77-80 from:
to:
- Large Format
- Lens
- Schneider-Kreutznach 150mm f/5.6 Symmar-S Multi Coated in Copal #0
July 23, 2008, at 05:14 PM
by 67.68.241.15 -
Added line 69:
July 23, 2008, at 04:26 PM
by 67.68.241.15 -
Deleted lines 65-67:
Deleted line 66:
July 23, 2008, at 04:24 PM
by 67.68.241.15 -
Deleted lines 72-74:
July 23, 2008, at 04:21 PM
by 67.68.241.15 -
Changed lines 57-59 from:
to:
Deleted line 69:
July 23, 2008, at 04:19 PM
by 67.68.241.15 -
Deleted line 56:
July 23, 2008, at 04:17 PM
by 67.68.241.15 -
Deleted lines 60-62:
Changed lines 87-93 from:
to:
July 23, 2008, at 04:50 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Added line 20:
Added line 25:
July 23, 2008, at 04:25 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Changed lines 34-39 from:
- If you didn't have a computer, didn't want to learn software or if you mainly print pictures just forget digital. Film is very cheap: a used Professional Camera sell for 250-300$, and a film (36 pictures) process with 4'x6' print cost between 5 to 10$ same price or less expensive than digital.
- If you have a scanner and time, forget digital camera. A film provide 8 Millions of pixels with an average scanner.
- If you shoot less than 1000 pictures per year the least expensive digital camera is the better one.
- If you intend to shoot more the smaller DSLR will be the best (Nikon D40 with 18-55mm non-VR).
- Note that film still beat digital in the Professional range. With Medium format camera you can obtain a 25Mpx from 645 format, 38Mpx from 67 format, 50Mpx from 69 format and 115Mpx with a Large Format Camera. All these Mpx are calculated with a basic 150$ photo scanner without interpolation.
to:
July 23, 2008, at 04:24 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Changed lines 30-31 from:
to:
Changed lines 33-34 from:
to:
Changed lines 44-45 from:
to:
Added lines 47-48:
July 23, 2008, at 04:16 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Changed line 29 from:
- Which camera is the best ?
to:
Changed line 45 from:
- Quel est le meilleur appareil ?
to:
July 23, 2008, at 04:07 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Changed lines 33-57 from:
- None ! because price and pixels didn't matter ! The Photographer Do !
Need a proof ? here a comparison between the D1x (2001) and the D300 (2008). Both provide sharp pictures, the only real difference is the time you need to have these results. Whereas the D300 pictures are obtained directly from the camera, D1x's picture required to shoot in raw mode and convert it.
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
D1x
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
D300
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
to:
July 23, 2008, at 04:06 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Changed line 32 from:
- Which camera is really the best ?
to:
Changed lines 71-95 from:
- Quel est vraiment le meilleur appareil ?
- Aucun ! car le prix et le nombre de pixel n'a rien à voir la dedans ! C'est le photographe qui fait la différence !
Vous voulez une preuve ? et hop comparaison entre le D1x (sorti en 2001) et le D300 (sortie en 2008). En fait la seule différence est le temps passé sur l'ordinateur. Les photos provenant du D300 sont tel que prise par l'appareil alors que celle du D1x sont des fichiers bruts convertis.
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
D1x
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
D300
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
to:
July 23, 2008, at 04:03 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Deleted lines 36-55:
- Digital or Film ?
- If you didn't have a computer, didn't want to learn software or if you mainly print pictures just forget digital. Film is very cheap: a used Professional Camera sell for 250-300$, and a film (36 pictures) process with 4'x6' print cost between 5 to 10$ same price or less expensive than digital.
- If you have a scanner and time, forget digital camera. A film provide 8 Millions of pixels with an average scanner.
- If you shoot less than 1000 pictures per year the least expensive digital camera is the better one.
- If you intend to shoot more the smaller DSLR will be the best (Nikon D40 with 18-55mm non-VR).
- Note that film still beat digital in the Professional range. With Medium format camera you can obtain a 25Mpx from 645 format, 38Mpx from 67 format, 50Mpx from 69 format and 115Mpx with a Large Format Camera. All these Mpx are calculated with a basic 150$ photo scanner without interpolation.
(:if userlang fr:)
Matériel:
- Quel est le meilleur appareil ?
- Quel est vraiment le meilleur appareil ?
- Aucun ! car le prix et le nombre de pixel n'a rien à voir la dedans ! C'est le photographe qui fait la différence !
Vous voulez une preuve ? et hop comparaison entre le D1x (sorti en 2001) et le D300 (sortie en 2008). En fait la seule différence est le temps passé sur l'ordinateur. Les photos provenant du D300 sont tel que prise par l'appareil alors que celle du D1x sont des fichiers bruts convertis.
(:if:)
Changed lines 58-59 from:
to:
- Digital or Film ?
- If you didn't have a computer, didn't want to learn software or if you mainly print pictures just forget digital. Film is very cheap: a used Professional Camera sell for 250-300$, and a film (36 pictures) process with 4'x6' print cost between 5 to 10$ same price or less expensive than digital.
- If you have a scanner and time, forget digital camera. A film provide 8 Millions of pixels with an average scanner.
- If you shoot less than 1000 pictures per year the least expensive digital camera is the better one.
- If you intend to shoot more the smaller DSLR will be the best (Nikon D40 with 18-55mm non-VR).
- Note that film still beat digital in the Professional range. With Medium format camera you can obtain a 25Mpx from 645 format, 38Mpx from 67 format, 50Mpx from 69 format and 115Mpx with a Large Format Camera. All these Mpx are calculated with a basic 150$ photo scanner without interpolation.
Changed lines 66-95 from:
to:
Matériel:
- Quel est le meilleur appareil ?
- Quel est vraiment le meilleur appareil ?
- Aucun ! car le prix et le nombre de pixel n'a rien à voir la dedans ! C'est le photographe qui fait la différence !
Vous voulez une preuve ? et hop comparaison entre le D1x (sorti en 2001) et le D300 (sortie en 2008). En fait la seule différence est le temps passé sur l'ordinateur. Les photos provenant du D300 sont tel que prise par l'appareil alors que celle du D1x sont des fichiers bruts convertis.
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
D1x
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
D300
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
Added lines 98-103:
(:if userlang en:)
(:if userlang fr:)
(:if:)
July 20, 2008, at 06:47 AM
by 67.68.233.110 -
Changed lines 37-43 from:
to:
- Digital or Film ?
- If you didn't have a computer, didn't want to learn software or if you mainly print pictures just forget digital. Film is very cheap: a used Professional Camera sell for 250-300$, and a film (36 pictures) process with 4'x6' print cost between 5 to 10$ same price or less expensive than digital.
- If you have a scanner and time, forget digital camera. A film provide 8 Millions of pixels with an average scanner.
- If you shoot less than 1000 pictures per year the least expensive digital camera is the better one.
- If you intend to shoot more the smaller DSLR will be the best (Nikon D40 with 18-55mm non-VR).
- Note that film still beat digital in the Professional range. With Medium format camera you can obtain a 25Mpx from 645 format, 38Mpx from 67 format, 50Mpx from 69 format and 115Mpx with a Large Format Camera. All these Mpx are calculated with a basic 150$ photo scanner without interpolation.
June 19, 2008, at 03:28 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed lines 42-43 from:
to:
June 19, 2008, at 03:13 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Added line 19:
Added line 23:
June 19, 2008, at 03:07 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed lines 33-35 from:
Need a proof ? here a comparison between the D1x (2001) and the D300 (2008):
to:
Need a proof ? here a comparison between the D1x (2001) and the D300 (2008). Both provide sharp pictures, the only real difference is the time you need to have these results. Whereas the D300 pictures are obtained directly from the camera, D1x's picture required to shoot in raw mode and convert it.
Changed lines 45-46 from:
Vous voulez une preuve ? et hop comparaison entre le D1x (sorti en 2001) et le D300 (sortie en 2008):
to:
Vous voulez une preuve ? et hop comparaison entre le D1x (sorti en 2001) et le D300 (sortie en 2008). En fait la seule différence est le temps passé sur l'ordinateur. Les photos provenant du D300 sont tel que prise par l'appareil alors que celle du D1x sont des fichiers bruts convertis.
June 19, 2008, at 12:45 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed line 61 from:
to:
Changed line 66 from:
to:
June 19, 2008, at 12:44 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed line 61 from:
to:
Changed line 66 from:
to:
June 19, 2008, at 12:40 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed line 63 from:
to:
June 19, 2008, at 12:38 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed line 54 from:
to:
Changed line 64 from:
to:
June 19, 2008, at 12:38 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed line 54 from:
to:
Added line 64:
June 19, 2008, at 12:35 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed lines 53-54 from:
to:
Changed line 56 from:
to:
June 19, 2008, at 12:34 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Added lines 33-35:
Need a proof ? here a comparison between the D1x (2001) and the D300 (2008):
Added lines 45-46:
Vous voulez une preuve ? et hop comparaison entre le D1x (sorti en 2001) et le D300 (sortie en 2008):
Added lines 49-67:
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
(:table border=0 align=center bgcolor="white" cellspacing=0 :)
(:cellnr align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
(:cell align=center:)
(:tableend:)
June 19, 2008, at 12:29 AM
by 67.68.235.168 -
Changed lines 26-29 from:
- Which camera is the best ? Digital Camera Reviews
to:
- Which camera is the best ?
Added lines 31-32:
- None ! because price and pixels didn't matter ! The Photographer Do !
Changed lines 35-38 from:
- Quel est le meilleur appareil ? Digital Camera Reviews
to:
- Quel est le meilleur appareil ?
Added lines 40-41:
- Aucun ! car le prix et le nombre de pixel n'a rien à voir la dedans ! C'est le photographe qui fait la différence !
May 25, 2008, at 04:58 PM
by 67.68.232.89 -
Added line 72:
March 07, 2008, at 05:31 AM
by 67.68.198.125 -
Deleted line 17:
Deleted line 20:
- La balance des blancs ou le comment du pourquoi utiliser le format brut d'image de l'appareil ! Démonstration?
March 07, 2008, at 05:30 AM
by 67.68.198.125 -
March 07, 2008, at 05:26 AM
by 67.68.198.125 -
Added line 44:
January 24, 2008, at 03:43 AM
by 65.95.35.198 -
Changed line 19 from:
to:
Changed line 23 from:
to:
January 22, 2008, at 10:27 PM
by 67.68.196.169 -
Changed lines 70-71 from:
to:
January 22, 2008, at 10:24 PM
by 67.68.196.169 -
Changed lines 70-71 from:
to:
December 17, 2007, at 03:18 AM
by 67.68.240.226 -
Changed lines 5-7 from:
to:
+++ UNDER CONSTRUCTION ++
Changed lines 12-13 from:
to:
November 30, 2007, at 02:58 AM
by 65.95.34.12 -
Added line 41:
November 30, 2007, at 02:45 AM
by 65.95.34.12 -
Changed line 68 from:
to:
November 29, 2007, at 04:09 AM
by 65.95.34.12 -
Changed line 56 from:
to:
November 29, 2007, at 03:59 AM
by 65.95.34.12 -
Added line 54:
Added line 56:
Added line 59:
Deleted line 61:
Deleted line 64:
November 29, 2007, at 03:57 AM
by 65.95.34.12 -
Added lines 4-5:
Is just some pages to have a memo, not a real guide for buying photographic stuff. So don't be disappointed.
Added lines 8-10:
Ce ne sont juste que quelque pages de mémo, pas vraiment un guide d'achat.
November 09, 2007, at 03:25 AM
by 67.68.206.47 -
Changed line 51 from:
to:
Changed line 57 from:
to:
November 09, 2007, at 03:15 AM
by 67.68.206.47 -
Added line 50:
Changed lines 59-60 from:
to:
November 09, 2007, at 02:47 AM
by 67.68.206.47 -
Added line 50:
Added line 56:
Changed lines 61-62 from:
to:
October 12, 2007, at 02:45 AM
by 67.68.234.95 -
Changed line 29 from:
to:
Changed line 31 from:
to:
Changed lines 34-41 from:
to:
Changed line 43 from:
to:
Changed line 45 from:
to:
Changed lines 48-67 from:
to:
October 12, 2007, at 02:44 AM
by 67.68.234.95 -
Changed line 9 from:
to:
Changed line 13 from:
to:
Changed line 19 from:
to:
Changed line 23 from:
to:
October 12, 2007, at 02:43 AM
by 67.68.234.95 -
Changed lines 20-21 from:
Which camera is the best ? Digital Camera Reviews
to:
- Which camera is the best ? Digital Camera Reviews
- Which camera is really the best ?
Changed lines 24-25 from:
Quel est le meilleur appareil ? Digital Camera Reviews
to:
- Quel est le meilleur appareil ? Digital Camera Reviews
- Quel est vraiment le meilleur appareil ?
October 12, 2007, at 02:41 AM
by 67.68.234.95 -
Changed line 27 from:
to:
Changed line 29 from:
to:
Added lines 31-56:
(:if userlang en:)
Lens:
(:if userlang fr:)
Objectifs:
(:if:)
Changed lines 58-60 from:
- Nikon AF 35mm f/2
- Nikon AF-S DX 12-24mm f/4 IF-ED
- Nikon AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
to:
September 10, 2007, at 03:45 AM
by 67.68.204.168 -
Changed line 11 from:
to:
Changed line 15 from:
to:
September 10, 2007, at 03:02 AM
by 67.68.204.168 -
Added line 11:
Added line 15:
July 31, 2007, at 05:52 PM
by 70.49.200.43 -
Deleted lines 0-2:
July 27, 2007, at 04:16 PM
by 132.208.68.77 -
Changed line 21 from:
Which camera is the best ? Digital Camera Reviews
to:
Which camera is the best ? Digital Camera Reviews
Changed line 24 from:
Quel est le meilleur appareil ? Digital Camera Reviews
to:
Quel est le meilleur appareil ? Digital Camera Reviews
July 27, 2007, at 04:15 PM
by 132.208.68.77 -
Added line 21:
Which camera is the best ? Digital Camera Reviews
Added line 24:
Quel est le meilleur appareil ? Digital Camera Reviews
July 26, 2007, at 03:54 PM
by 132.208.68.77 -
Changed lines 13-14 from:
to:
July 26, 2007, at 03:52 PM
by 132.208.68.77 -
Changed lines 4-5 from:
to:
(:if userlang en:)
Photography
(:if userlang fr:)
Photographie
(:if:)
(:if userlang en:)
- Technical:
- White balance or the good use of raw pictures.
Démonstration?
(:if userlang fr:)
Changed lines 18-22 from:
to:
(:if:)
(:if userlang en:)
(:if userlang fr:)
Changed lines 24-28 from:
to:
(:if:)
(:if userlang en:)
Lens:
(:if userlang fr:)
Added line 30:
July 26, 2007, at 03:46 PM
by 132.208.68.77 -
Added lines 1-3:
July 26, 2007, at 03:17 PM
by 132.208.68.77 -
Changed line 9 from:
- Sigma 150mm f/2.8 APO Macro DG HSM D
to:
July 24, 2007, at 01:06 AM
by Lionel -
Changed lines 1-3 from:
La photographie
- La balance des blancs ou le comment du pourquoi utiliser le format brut d'image de l'appareil ! Démonstration?
to:
Photographie
- Techniques:
- La balance des blancs ou le comment du pourquoi utiliser le format brut d'image de l'appareil ! Démonstration?
- Matériel:
Objectifs:
- Sigma 150mm f/2.8 APO Macro DG HSM D
- Nikon AF 35mm f/2
- Nikon AF-S DX 12-24mm f/4 IF-ED
- Nikon AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
July 04, 2007, at 04:53 AM
by 67.68.242.205 -
Changed lines 1-3 from:
to:
La photographie
- La balance des blancs ou le comment du pourquoi utiliser le format brut d'image de l'appareil ! Démonstration?
April 12, 2007, at 08:52 PM
by 67.68.196.157 -
Added line 1:
